Tag Archives: politics

Green Gloves and Red Squares

Anna Wintour, editor-in-chief of Vogue magazine, was a recent guest on The Colbert Report.  When Stephen Colbert commented that fashion was a trivial pursuit,  she countered that “fashion reflects culture; it reflects our times. A great fashion photograph can tell you just as much about what is going on in our world as any headline or TV report.”

Take Michelle Obama for example. A recent book entitled Michelle Style studies the choices of Mrs. O, “the first lady of fashion.”  Because she mixes off-the-rack clothes from Gap and J. Crew with American designer frocks, Obama sends the message that she is accessible, someone that Americans of every economic status can relate to. Following the inauguration she donned a pair of olive green leather gloves from mid-priced brand J. Crew and their stock immediately jumped 10.6 percent, an indication of the power of her influence. 

Michelle Obama in J. Crew

Everyday Icon: Michelle Obama and the Power of Style analyzes her image as it has evolved from what was initially dubbed  “angry Black woman”  to the current one of  “Power Wife” and “Mom in Chief.” Clearly how one dresses communicates one’s associations and values.

Tomboy styleClothes have played a significant role in my life and helped shape my political views. I recall the day in 1967 when I was sent home from high school for wearing blue jeans in violation of the dress code of skirts only for girls. My feminism “clicked” on that day.  Alison Lurie noted in The Language of Clothes that “women in trousers are viewed as wanting to wear The Pants, which in our culture, for centuries is the symbolic badge of male authority.” That rebelliousness is celebrated in Tomboy Style,  which champions those women who “blur the line between masculinity and feminity” and defy gender stereotyping.

Scott Schuman began photographing street style and posting images on The Sartorialist blog, with the idea of creating a dialogue about the world of fashion and its relationship to daily life. He looks beyond runway models and haute couture to the individual on the street who expresses his or her own point of view apart from the idealized images and dictates of fashion magazines. 

Similarly, the DVD Bill Cunningham New York documents the photographer who has immortalized real people and their personal style on the streets of New York for decades.

Speaking of the street, Quebec protestors are wearing their politics on their sleeves by safety-pinning on red felt squares as a symbol of solidarity. The “red square” appeared at Cannes Film Festival on the tuxedo of Quebec director Xavier Dolan. Montreal-based band Arcade Fire wore red squares when they performed on Saturday Night Live with “street fighting man” Mick Jagger who sported a red shirt.

Far from being a trivial topic, fashion raises many different and important questions. So say the editors of Fashion : Thinking with Style, which explores how changing sex roles, political upheavals, class structure and globalization have all influenced fashion.

Thoughts to ponder as we pull our summer clothes out of storage.

Jane

Trust and the Public Good

How healthy is our democracy? That’s a loaded and provocative question. For some commentators it is the most pressing question of our time.

In Chris Hedges’ collection of essays The World As It Is, he cites Sheldon S. Wolin’s concept of “inverted totalitarianism“, detailed in Wolin’s latest book Democracy Incorporated. Wolin claims that modern democracies are not threatened by direct forms of dictatorship like a one-party state or a demagogic leader, but by more subtle forms: indifference, apathy, and ignoring social problems in favour of individual pursuits and pre-occupations.

This analysis can be traced back to Neil Postman’s 1985 classic Amusing Ourselves to Death (a 20th anniversary edition was published in 2006) which saw the pursuit of being entertained becoming an end in itself. The idea of challenging oneself and questioning the world around us is considered boring and the ultimate waste of time. 

Writers like Cass Sunstein (author of Republic.com)and Robert D. Putnam trace how traditional organizations like social service clubs and various associations once built social networks between people who would not normally have much in common. These informal social networks helped create the bonds which formed the sinews of democracy. For some, social media and the voluntary relationships found online have effectively replaced these traditional building blocks of democracy. For me, personally, I’m not so sure.

The unifying theme of these various points of view is that if democracy is to flourish in our age and into the future, there must be ways for diverse people with little in common to establish trust between us. But trust appears to be the rarest of commodities today: we don’t trust the expert,  we don’t trust the elitist intellectual, we don’t trust the company executive, we don’t trust the self-serving union bosses… if everyone has an agenda, where do we find the common ground or the public good?

How to build that trust in our democracy and in our personal relationships is one of the most pressing problems we face. I certainly can’t get my head around this issue in a single blog post, but here are some titles that may help us get started:

 Liars and Outliers by Bruce Schneier

Smart Trust by Stephen M. R. Covey

Trust: Self interest and the common good by Marek Kohn

Greater Good: How good marketing makes for better democracy by John A. Quelch

The Spirit of Democracy by Larry Jay Diamond.

Phil

The Age of Authenticity: Oprah over Freud

In Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor’s book A Secular Age he makes a distinction between the ‘Age of Mobilization’ and the ‘Age of Authenticity’ with the mobilization period being represented by an increase sense of individual awareness and a sense of identity. This age had a long time to develop but was loudly proclaimed by Martin Luther’s nailing of the “95 Theses” in 1517 and lasted to about the end of the World War II.

The ‘Age of Mobilization’ produced all the great isms of our modern world: nationalism, conservatism, liberalism, socialism, etc. where people formed alliances and bonds with similar like-minded people and not necessarily those of their own kin or tribe. This period of choice produced tremendous excitement but also tremendous social anxiety; this is many ways was the essence of Freud’s concern between the needs and demands of society to maintain order and the needs and wants of the new emerging individual to find fulfillment.

But something happened following World War II which is hard to define but palpable to feel. A sense that all the great beliefs that defined the ‘Age of Mobilization’ have failed us (or at least have proven to be imperfect) and could no longer be trusted or relied upon. Doubt and uncertainly is now the basic fact of life. From the Cold War, Vietnam, the Kennedy-King assassinations, to the student rebellions in Paris and Berkeley in 1968 to Watergate it has come clear that the values of Western societies are open questions of disagreement and not necessarily universal truths. Or if these truths are universal people will still debate and question where one truth begins and ends and when it has gone to too far.

If institutions and belief systems fail us then it is logical that it is individual happiness and personal development becomes the most important pursuit of our lives. The authentic quest becomes the primary goal of modern life. The question becomes whether finding this type of goal is possible or even desirable. Could we recognize an authentic life even if it was presented right in front us? To our rescue come the self-help movements and television, internet, social media and my I dare say even bloggers…

Here is my list of the real thing:

Finding Contentment
Neil Clark Warren

Sincerity and Authenticity
Lionel Trilling

Scars of the Spirit
Geoffrey H. Hartman

The Hard Questions for an Authentic Life
Susan Piver

The Thing Itself
Richard Todd

The Authenticity Hoax: How We Get Lost Finding Ourselves
Andrew PotterView full image

Better Make It Real
Jill J. Morin

Living Oprah: My One-Year Experiment to Walk the Walk of the Queen of Talk
Robyn Okrant

-phil d.

The tradition and future of liberalism

Recently, I started to read up on the idea of liberalism in Western society.  Much has been written lately by journalists, commentators, bloggers and political parties themselves. Two notable and recent books in particular stood out that perfectly debate the traditions, successes, predicaments and prospects of liberalism.  Although both books are written primarily from the American point of view, their arguments apply to the liberal tradition throughout the western democracies.

Alan Wolfe’s The Future of Liberalism  and Chris Hedges’ Death of the Liberal Class. Wolfe’s book outlines the tradition and idealism of the liberal tradition. At the core of this tradition is the attempt to strike a balance between the extreme absolute positions of socialism/communism and that of the market fundamentalist. At its best liberalism is a theory and principle continuously grounded in the real world that people are living in. The goal then is to create the conditions for people to realize their full potential, whether that includes government intervention or not, the principle lies in its flexibility and not in the way human goals are accomplished.

That flexibility in many ways provides the basis of Hedges’ criticism of the current liberal tradition. The liberal tradition in his view represents the many segments of society’s elites that have been made comfortable, smug and resistant to change and progress. It includes a very wide tent: universities, unions, the media, churches, etc. representing a modern version of the ancien regime, a ruling group that has had its own way for so long they are somehow surprised when the democratic mass rejects their authority.

How this concludes is a very open question, but a good list of titles that take on this issue include:

What title would you add to the list?

Phil

Why pray for Hitch?

A group within the American evangelical community has created a website to encourage Christians to pray for Christopher Hitchens. Mr. Hitchens is undergoing chemotherapy and the evangelists hope that their prayers will encourage God to intervene to cure the writer, public intellectual, general provocateur and militant atheist. The comments and discussions on the website pull together the four elements of nonfiction that I find most fascinating: history, politics, philosophy and religion.

Mr. Hitchens’ position on this matter is clear and well documented and supported by the leading luminaries of the new atheist school: Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris.  The counter argument is well represented by John F. Haught; but piercing through the rhetoric are two writers who have moved me lately: Chris Hedges and Karen Armstrong.

The most comprehensive book that puts the God debate into a deeper perspective is Charles Taylor’s “A Secular Age”, recipient of the 2007 John Templeton Prize. This is not an easy read by any means, but patient and attentive reading will reap many rewards.

Clearly, it is not up to us to dictate and demand how or what other people should believe; but we should challenge our beliefs and understand our own bias and prejudices. A public library provides a wide range of books, DVDs, databases and other resources to help you understand any number of controversies. I encourage you to visit the library to begin your journey.  As Hitchens has stated, if the prayer initiatives do heal his cancer: “That would be somehow irritating!”

- Phil